๐’๐š๐Ÿ๐š๐ซ๐ข ๐‘๐ž๐ญ๐ซ๐ž๐š๐ญ๐ฌ – ๐Œ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐š๐ฐ๐š๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐’๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ž๐ฆ๐ž ๐‚๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ ๐๐ž๐œ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐œ๐š๐ฌ๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ˆ๐“๐‚ ๐ž๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐›๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐จ๐ง ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ฆ๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ (๐ข๐ฆ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฏ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ญ๐ฒ) for the purpose of letting out premises in the malls to different tenants on which GST output liability to be paid.

๐’๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ž๐ฆ๐ž ๐‚๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐ž๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ž๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐Ÿ 17(5)(๐) ๐ญ๐จ ๐›๐ž ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฐ๐ž๐ ๐›๐ฒ ๐š๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐…๐ฎ๐ง๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ž๐œ๐ข๐๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ฐ๐ก๐ž๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ ๐›๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ข๐ฌ ‘๐๐ฅ๐š๐ง๐ญ’ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ž ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐›๐ž ๐๐ž๐œ๐ข๐๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐š๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐š๐ญ๐ž ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐œ๐ž๐ž๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐œ๐ก ๐š๐๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐ข๐œ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐œ๐š๐ง ๐›๐ž ๐ฆ๐š๐๐ž ๐จ๐ง ๐Ÿ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ฌ.

Key summary of the verdict:

โžก Constitutional validity of clauses (c) and (d) of Section 17(5) is ๐”๐๐‡๐„๐‹๐ƒ

โžก “plant or machinery” used in Section 17(5)(d) cannot be given the same meaning as “plant and machinery” defined by explanation to Sec 17

โžก Whether a mall, warehouse, or building can be classified as a “plant”  is a ๐Ÿ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐š๐ฅ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง which has to be determined based on registered person’s business and role that building plays in the said business.

โžก Buildings constructed for services like renting or leasing may qualify as a ‘๐ฉ๐ฅ๐š๐ง๐ญ’, ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐›๐ฃ๐ž๐œ๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐š ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ง๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ

โžก Supreme Court ๐ซ๐ž๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐œ๐š๐ฌ๐ž ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐Ž๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐š ๐‡๐ข๐ ๐ก ๐‚๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ for limited purposes of deciding whether, in the facts of the case, the shopping mall is a โ€œplantโ€ as per Sec 17(5)(d)

Bottomline:

๐„๐š๐œ๐ก ๐œ๐š๐ฌ๐ž ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ก๐š๐ฏ๐ž ๐ญ๐จ ๐›๐ž ๐๐ž๐œ๐ข๐๐ž๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐ž๐ซ๐ข๐ญ ๐›๐ฒ ๐š๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ง๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ฆ๐ฌ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ. The issue must be decided in appropriate proceedings in which adjudication can be made on facts. The petitioners are free to adopt appropriate proceedings or raise the issue in appropriate proceedings.

The writ petitions are rejected, subject to the interpretation of 17(5)(d) made in the verdict by Supreme Court.

Author

GGSH

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This field is required.

This field is required.