“๐˜š๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ ๐˜๐˜Ž๐˜š๐˜› ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ง๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜™๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ 96(10)”โ“

For many #exporters, this has not been just a legal question…
It has been money stuck, refunds pending & uncertainty continuing for years ๐Ÿ˜ค

There is now a SIGNIFICANT CLARITY from the ๐—›๐—ผ๐—ป’๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜.

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด โš–๏ธ
In M/s Goodluck India Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors., SLP(C) No. 24550/2025 (& connected matters), the #SupremeCourt dismissed the Union of India’s appeals on Aug 6, 2026. The Honโ€™ble Supreme Court upheld the view that omission of Rule 96(10) – effective 08.10.2024 applies to proceedings that were still pending as on that date.

๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐Ÿ’ฏ
Rule 96(10) was omitted without a SAVING CLAUSE or SUNSET PROVISION. Relying on the #ConstitutionBench decision in “Kolhapur Canesugar Works Ltd. v. Union of India” on the legal effect of omitting a provision without a saving clause, the Court held that a rule which no longer exists can’t be used to restrict refund claims in matters still pending.

๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ
(a) Refunds withheld or rejected solely on Rule 96(10) grounds
(b) Adjudications where contravention of Rule 96(10) is the sole or primary allegation
(c) #Appeals & writs that were kept pending this exact question
If your case falls into one of these, Rule 96(10) is no longer available to the department as a ground to hold refund.

๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ปโ€™๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐Ÿ™…๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ
The question of eligibility under applicable refund provisions & compliance with other statutory requirements continues to remain relevant.

๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„ โ˜‘๏ธ
1. Pull pending refund files where Rule 96(10) was cited as basis for rejection or withholding.
2. Check #adjudication and appeal files for the same ground.
3. Reconcile the underlying #ExportDocumentation before pressing the claim, since eligibility is still very much in play
4. Where an order already relied on Rule 96(10), assess whether consequential relief is now available.

There is a LARGER LESSON here…

An amendment is not merely something to read when it arrives. Its legal consequences may continue to unfold years later. For #exporters who have been waiting, this may finally be the time to take those pending files out and review them again!

๐˜š๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด, ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ท๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ถ๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ข ๐˜ซ๐˜ถ๐˜ฅ๐˜จ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ถ๐˜ต ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ๐˜ด ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ง๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ ๐˜บ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜บ.
โ€‹
Read the Supreme Court order here – https://www.sci.gov.in/

๐—”๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜ ๐ŸŽฌ
If your refund has been withheld, rejected or remains under dispute specifically on account of Rule 96(10), review the matter afresh in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling.

Author

CA Saradha Hariharan

Co-Founder Partner | Head of Indirect Tax Advisory GGSH & Co. LLP

Avatar photo
Written By

Co-Founder Partner | Head of Indirect Tax Advisory GGSH & Co. LLP

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This field is required.

This field is required.